Absence makes the genitalia grow weirder

One shaft, four heads. The echidna and it’s nightmare-inducing penis. (Photo by Lucy Cooke, via nationalgeographic.com)

Evolution loves penises. How else do you explain all the crazy penis shapes out there? Por ejemplo (slightly nsfw): the corkscrew duck penis, the spiny cat and chimp members, the sci-fi-esque spiked penis of a seed beetle, the 4-headed penis of the echidna, and, well, all of these.

Why so many ways to make a sperm delivery system?

The shape, size, and WTF-ness of penises in part depends on the mating system it’s a part of. For example, Muscovy ducks have crazy long, corkscrew-shaped penises, possibly because they’re part of a very competitive mating system. Males and females form tight pair-bonds, but this doesn’t stop rival males from trying to get in on the gene-spreading action. Males will often forcibly copulate with females, and the longer and twistier their penis, the more likely they’ll be able to get their sperm closer to the eggs.

But female ducks evolved countermeasures. Their genital tracts became twisted, too (in the opposite direction) to make it more difficult for a male to force his way in. And on it goes.

Other animals can get away with having penises that physically harm the female. Examples include bed bugs and seed beetles. It actually works out in the male’s favor to induce harm, because the female will have less lifespan to mate with other males. There’s no pressure from the female side to select for less knife-like dongs, because they end up having a crapload of babies anyway.

Basically, there are a zillion different ways of having sex and making babies. And there’s a special penis shape for each and every one.

Lock and key

Okay, so evolution can push penis shapes to crazy extremes–and it does so ridiculously quickly–but of course there must be limits. The key still has to fit the lock, so to speak. So, as penis shapes evolve in one direction, lady parts follow, as long as these new shapes are beneficial. But not every member of a species will mate with every other member of the species. Especially if there are pockets of this species that are isolated from one another.

What would happen if two populations, that were isolated for a long time, came together and, um, didn’t fit anymore? Could this be the driving force for making two species out of one? Researchers Janine Wojcieszek and Leigh Simmons at Murdoch University in Australia used millipedes to answer this question. Continue reading

Posted in Evolution of sex, Sexual selection | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Update to duck penis science

Back in 2011, I posted a video about duck penis research. Sadly, that video is gone. But I replaced it with another showing how the duck penis can break through several types of materials in the shape of duck ladyparts. Check it out here, along with a link to an article posted on Slate today by the duck science sexpert herself, Dr. Patricia Brennan.

Aside | Posted on by | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

What your testicles taste

Bet you never thought about what testes and your tongue have in common. You're welcome. (Image via Wikimedia)

Bet you never thought about what testes and your tongue have in common. You’re welcome. (Image via Wikimedia)

Most people probably think of tastebuds as existing only on their tongues, but did you know there are taste buds in testes? It’s true. Sort of. They aren’t exactly like the taste buds in your mouth. Male germ cells–the cells that are destined to become sperm–have molecules on them that can detect bitter tastes.

These bitter taste receptors, called T2rs, were recently discovered on male germ cells by researchers at the Monell Chemical Senses Center in Philadelphia, PA. Obviously, the first (and from my perspective, only) question that came to mind was: why? Why do pre-sperm cells need to be able to “taste” bitter compounds?

The researchers first looked at what happens when these cells come into contact with bitter-tasting stuff. But it still remains a mystery why testes need taste receptors in the first place.
Continue reading

Posted in Eggs and sperm | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Special issue in Nature on gender bias!

Cover image of the March 7 issue of Nature. Image by Viktor Koen.

I was very pleasantly surprised to see that Nature’s most recent issue is focused on the gender gap in the sciences. Just this past November, Nature finally copped to the fact that they have some serious work of their own to do on fighting sexism. While Nature’s hiring practices for reporters and editors of their news content is sound (54% women), they were lacking in other areas: only 14% of referees for Nature publications are women and only 18% of researchers profiled in their “News and Views” section in 2011 and 2012 were women. While they rightly assert that this is most likely due to subconscious factors (even scientists are biased against women), they also realized that this doesn’t let them off the hook.

The March 7, 2013 issue features great content all about the issues women scientists face and what can and should be done to address the problem. Continue reading

Posted in Sex and society, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

More stuff for pregnant women to freak out about

A quick look at the press releases on Eurekalert for this week yielded:

So, in case my last post about how scary pregnancy is didn’t convince you, here’s some more to chew on. Do you think all this information helps expectant mothers? How much is too much to expect from a pregnant woman?

Aside | Posted on by | Tagged , , | Leave a comment